DEFINITION OF THE WORDS ; 'GOD',- 'TRUTH', & 'RELIGION'

Historic and archaeological evidences show that the Ancient Arabian people did not leave any written testimony of themselves before the received the influence of Assyria, around 8th - 7th centuries BCE, and all what we know about them until then has been recorded by external sources and accounts of eye-witnesses. The peoples of Arabia had no records of their own genealogies, which have been artificially invented into Islamic times as well as the alleged pre-Islamic history without any real knowledge concerning location and period, besides the imaginary character of the events. There were many examples that show the inaccuracy of the Islamic traditional concepts, based on hearsay from the unreliable sources. Just to mention a couple of them, one is that the Quran identifies Miryam the sister of Aaron with Miryam, the mother of Jesus (Isa) as if she was the same person, when actually there are about 1,400 years that separate the two Miryams; another is that in Surah "Al Qasas" (verse 38), Haman is said to be Pharaoh's vizier, mistaking both time and place, because actually Haman was a minister in the Persian king when there was no longer any Pharaoh in Egypt. The same Surah asserts that Pharaoh intended to build a tower, a story base on Josephus' account about Nimrod (Antiquities, 1:4). There are hundreds of resounding errors like these in the Quran which are not to be listed here since it is not the intention of this comment to make any process to religious conceptions, but only to present the historical truth.
Concerning the two Arabian forefathers, we can say that Qahtan may be well identified with the Biblical Joktan, but Adnan seems to be legendary, and as allegedly is only one of Ismael's descendants - not even one of his twelve sons - he cannot be the ancestor of all the Northern Arabians. The geographical distribution of the Ishmaelites indeed leave a vast "empty" space between them and the Joktanite peoples, namely the whole Central Arabia. The southern-most Ismaelite tribe was "Teyma," whose capital was located about 400 kilometers north from Yathrib (Medina). Yet, the Arab traditions assert that Ismael was with his father, Abraham, in Mecca (that is more than 700 kilometers south of "Teyma"), a claim that is utterly groundless, without the least hint of possibility to find any historical support. The only existing written record concerning the person of Ismael is found in the Bible, witnessing that he dwelled in the region of Paran, north of Midyan. This account was written by Mosheh, who spent half of his life in the very land where Ismael lived and had undoubtedly more accurate that the Arab writers that invented the tales about Abraham and Ismael more than 2,000 years after Mosheh.
The Bible scriptures as well describe Abraham's movements in a very accurate way, from his departure from Ur to Haran, then to Canaan, his journey to Egypt and Gherar, his expedition to rescue his nephew, and every place where he sojourned - none of them is in Arabia. He kept attached to his Akkadian family settled in Northern Mesopotamia and not to any allegedly sacred place in Arabia. That fact is that the name of Ismael was unknown in Central Arabia in pre-Islamic times, and the Arabic form "Isma'il", beginning with an "aleph" shows that it passed through the Greek and is not directly derived from the Semitic/Aramaic original name, "Yismael," with an initial "yod" - the change of a consonant or semi vowel into vowel is explained only if a Semitic name has been translated into a Western language, and then from the Western form into another Semitic tongue, which in this case of Hebrew into Greek and then into Arabic. In fact, there is no mention of Abraham or Ismael in any ancient Arabian inscription, neither Sabean nor Minean, nor Safaitic, nor Lihyanite, nor Thamudic and not even Nabatean.
The Arabs got acquainted with the existence of Abraham and Ismael only through the Jewish and Christian sources from which islam drew its own scriptures. Therefore, according to overwhelming historic, archaeological, scriptural and scientific evidence, neither Abraham nor Ismael have ever been in Arabia from Midyan southwards.

I don't really understood what is this Thread mean..

why u explain god by make Jesus be taked point

Terrible's moeslem ever.

answering-ff wrote:

DariKelMuslim wrote:I don't really understood what is this Thread mean..

why u explain god by make Jesus be taked point

Terrible's moeslem ever.

Take a focus please,,, consider this,,

"GOD
will not do something that not worthy for HIM to do or to perform .
GOD will not do something that contrary to HIS own nature"

R u really read this thread..?
R i'm wrong say : awkawkawkkawkawk for u ..?

DariKelMuslim wrote:

answering-ff wrote:

DariKelMuslim wrote:I don't really understood what is this Thread mean..

why u explain god by make Jesus be taked point

Terrible's moeslem ever.

Take a focus please,,, consider this,,

"GOD
will not do something that not worthy for HIM to do or to perform .
GOD will not do something that contrary to HIS own nature"

R u really read this thread..?
R i'm wrong say : awkawkawkkawkawk for u ..?

Take a focus please,,, consider this,, "GOD will not do something that not worthy for HIM to do or to perform . GOD will not do something that contrary to HIS own nature"

By
its own nature, TRUTH in it self has definition, identities,
conditions, crateria, characteristic, signs and qualities that need to
be fulfilled .